-
New
- Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. & Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v. Shutui (Chongqing) Network Technology
-
This case is an exploration of "other" unfair competition acts under Article 12 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and provides guidelines for the adjudication of similar cases involving cybercrimes.
-
New
- Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Sodao Network Technology Co., Ltd. & Hangzhou Juketool Technology Co.,
-
This case is the first in China involving the determination of the rights and interests of WeChat data.
-
- Hunantv.com Interactive Entertainment Media Co., Ltd. v. Weisi Software (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
- The second instance judgment in this case made a multi-angle comprehensive evaluation of the browser's act of blocking video advertisements.
-
- Ningbo Cixing Co., Ltd. v. Ningbo Beworth Textile Machinery Co., Ltd.
- This case showcased the in-depth implementation of the central government's judicial policy requirements on the protection of property rights and the rights and interests of entrepreneurs.
-
New
- Union Brother (Shanghai) Machinery Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Woodsea Machinery Co., Ltd.
-
This case involves the investigation and verification of complex technical facts and the application of the law.
-
New
- Guangzhou Blue Whale Short Video Technology Co., Ltd. v. Yuexiu District Administration for Market Regulation of Guangzhou
-
If an application for business name registration was for the implementation of unfair competition, it would not be applicable to the principle of administrative trust protection.
-
New
- DuPont China Holding Co., Ltd. and DuPont (China) Research & Development and Management Co., Ltd. v. Xie
-
The judgment of this case regulates the unfair competition act of using fabricated identity and employment history to obtain unfair competitive advantages.
-
New
- Shenzhen Weiyuanma Software Development Co., Ltd. v. Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
-
WeChat is well-known software widely used by the public, and the acts accused in this case had a large impact on the daily life of the public.
-
New
- Shenzhen Ping'an International Hotel Co., Ltd. v. Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China Ltd.
-
Generic vocabulary can have acquired distinctiveness through long-term promotion and use, so the "proper use" of a trademark of the "generic term" nature is limited to the use of the first meaning of the term, i.e. the literal and inherent meaning of the word(s); The use of the second meaning of a "generic term" is actually an infringement act of the good reputation of another's well-known trademarks.
-
- Moody's Quality Management Co., Ltd. v. Hangzhou Aiming Internet Co., Ltd.
- The profitability of investing in domain names and the loopholes in the industry management have brought various chaos in the domain name registration industry.
-
New
- Shenzhen Laidian Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Zhixiang Technology Co., Ltd.
-
This case involves the determination of commercial disparagement committed by employees of a company through their personal social media accounts. WeChat Moments has now become an important channel for information dissemination, and a considerable number of operators have used WeChat Moments as a marketing place to release promotional content.
-
New
- Shanghai Lujinsuo Internet Financial Information Service Co., Ltd. v. Xi'an Luzhitou Software Technology Co., Ltd.
-
When an internet rushing buy service uses technical means to provide users of the target platform with an unfair rushing buy advantage, which destroys the established rushing buy rules of the target platform and deliberately bypasses its regulatory measures, causing serious damage to the user stickiness and business environment of the target platform, it shall be deemed to have constituted unfair competition.
-
New
- Hangzhou Longfun Internet Technology Co., Ltd. v. Beijing iQIYI Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
-
Through the effective regulation of new types of unfair competition acts under the context of internet competition environment, this case encourages operators to operate in good faith, maintain the normal competition order in the internet market, promote the healthy, orderly and standardized development of the internet video industry, which provides important regulatory guidelines for the rapidly developing internet industry in China.
-
- Hunan Eefung Software Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Weimeng Internet Technology Co., Ltd.
- If it is impossible to prove that public platform data has been captured through normal channels, the act of capturing the public data also constitutes unfair competition.
-
New
- Guangzhou Daming United Rubber Products Co., Ltd. v. Guinness World Records Limited
-
The unfair competition acts regulated by the principle provisions of Article 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law shall, first of all, not among the unfair competition acts or infringement acts of typical intellectual property rights explicitly enumerated in the law; second, they should be competitive acts leading to harm to the competitive interests of other operators.
- Hunan Eefung Software Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Weimeng Internet Technology Co., Ltd.
- Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. & Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v. Shutui (Chongqing) Network Technology
- Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. v. Zhejiang Sodao Network Technology Co., Ltd. & Hangzhou Juketool Technology Co.,
- Hunantv.com Interactive Entertainment Media Co., Ltd. v. Weisi Software (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.
- Union Brother (Shanghai) Machinery Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Woodsea Machinery Co., Ltd.
- Ningbo Cixing Co., Ltd. v. Ningbo Beworth Textile Machinery Co., Ltd.
- Shenzhen Ping'an International Hotel Co., Ltd. v. Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China Ltd.
- Shanghai Lujinsuo Internet Financial Information Service Co., Ltd. v. Xi'an Luzhitou Software Technology Co., Ltd.
京公网安备 11010802020770号